The Coherence Hypothesis: UAP, the Nonlocal Mind, and the Hidden Architecture of Reality

Most people think the UAP question is “What is it?” I think the real question is: what kind of reality are we living in, if something can consistently interact with perception, timing, and meaning as if the observer is part of the system.

Tic Tac UAP captured by Jedaiah Ramnarine for JR Prudence. Pay close attention to the video and you can notice the object appears in multiple spaces at once. JR saw this with his eyes. There was no trail, no smoke, and it ascended upwards, contrary to the camera shutters, struggling to keep up with the hypersonic speed.

TL;DR — The UAP Coherence Hypothesis

The UAP Coherence Hypothesis proposes that unidentified aerial phenomena are not only physical objects, but interfaces between consciousness and reality. Rather than treating UAP as isolated aviation anomalies, this framework suggests they often manifest through a coupling between non-human intelligence, information, and human perception.

In this model, consciousness is not a passive observer but part of the measurement system itself. Reality behaves as an information-rich field, and UAP appear when conditions of coherence, attention, and timing align. This helps explain why UAP encounters frequently cluster around perception, symbolism, altered states, intuition, and meaningful sequence rather than always behaving like conventional, purely mechanical objects.

In short:

• UAP behave like interactive phenomena, not just distant craft

• Consciousness is participatory, not incidental

• NHI may be operating through an information-based layer of reality

• The bottleneck is not secrecy, but perception and coherence

Representative Observations Referenced in This Article

These documented cases illustrate the behavioral patterns the Coherence Hypothesis is designed to explain:

• Four-Object Infrared Formation

  A coordinated formation of four UAP captured on infrared, exhibiting structured movement and geometry inconsistent with known aircraft, biological, or sensor artifacts.

• Triangular / Pyramid-Shaped UAP

  A stable, well-defined triangular object maintaining form over time, aligning with repeated geometric motifs observed across independent sightings.

• Two Bright UAP Over the Netherlands (Consecutive Nights)

  Recurrent luminous UAP observed on successive nights, demonstrating persistence and pattern rather than isolated coincidence.

These cases are not presented as proof, but as contextual anchors that function as observable data points that motivate the need for a broader interpretive framework.

The Coherence Hypothesis: UAP, the Nonlocal Mind, and the Hidden Architecture of Reality

Let's talk about this UAP Coherence Hypothesis. Most people are waiting for “Disclosure” to arrive like a press conference like a podium or a seal on the wall. A statement that settles the question forever. I think that expectation is understandable, but I also think it’s aimed at the wrong target. Not because institutions are all-evil or because the truth is “too scary,” but because the phenomenon itself does not behave like a conventional political secret that simply gets declassified.

What I’m going to lay out here is not a religion or New Ageism, not a faction, not a recruitment pitch, and not a list of characters in a cosmic soap opera. It’s a working model. A framework, and ultimately, a synthesis. It’s the best working structure I have right now for integrating four domains that modern culture keeps separating as if they are unrelated:

• UAP and non-human intelligence

• Consciousness, soul/spirit, and perception

• ESP-type effects (telepathy, remote viewing, precognitive “hits,” meaningful synchronicity)

• The deeper architecture of reality itself

My aim is simple: take the topic out of the usual traps and provide an understanding of the deeper framework connected to reality. Not the trap of blind belief, and not the trap of reflexive dismissal. Both are intellectually lazy in different ways.

I’m interested in the third position which is to treat the phenomenon like a real interface that interacts with the observer, and treat the observer like part of the measurement system, not a bystander.

That one shift changes everything.

1) The first mistake is thinking “UAP” is primarily an aviation problem

Jedaiah saw this tic tac sphere and caught it on camera in the above video during a clear night. The UAP was round, oval, and ascending upward with no streaks and no tail. Hypersonic speed.

Yes, some cases look like advanced craft. Yes, some appear to show performance characteristics that don’t map neatly onto conventional propulsion. But even if you had perfect footage tomorrow, the deeper question would still remain:

Why does this phenomenon so often cluster around perception, cognition, timing, symbolism, dreams, intuition, meditation, altered states, and personal meaning?

• Why does it appear to “lean into” the mind’s interpretive layer?

• What exactly is the connection with consciousness (which has admittedly been overused by New Ageism)?

• Why do people report not only sightings, but sequences: internal impressions first, then external confirmations, then follow-up anomalies that behave like responses?

  
  

You can call that coincidence if you want, but at scale, and over time, coincidence becomes a weak explanation. The data pattern suggests something else: there is a coupling between mind and manifestation. Not necessarily because the mind “hallucinates” the event, nor strictly psychological and neurological reductionist theories connected solely to subconscious salience, but because the event is not fully independent from the observer.

In other words, the phenomenon is not always just an object in the sky.

It’s an interaction.

Unlike science fiction LARPing from "contact reports" of perfectly blonde, blue-eyed "Nordics", communication with real NHI comes in the form of the event itself; the UAP showing up. That in itself is contact. True Non-Human Intelligence operates as the term NHI implies; non-human, thus, not resembling human anthropomorphic fantasies along with psychological, spiritual, religious, or cultural projections.

2) A better starting point: reality is information-rich, not object-simple

We were trained, culturally, to think of reality as a stage made of things such as particles, rocks, planets, bodies, and machines. However, the more closely you examine nature, the more you find something stranger, especially when you combine quantum mechanics with information theory.

In truth, reality behaves like a system where information is fundamental, and “things” are stable patterns of information. Even everyday life hints at this. You never experience raw reality. You experience a model of reality, constructed by your nervous system, guided by attention, filtered by expectation, and stabilized by memory. Most people are aware of classical reality, yet have no clue that on a quantum scale, forces do not exist the same way. In reverse, from a relativistic standpoint, the further we travel in space, the more time dilation occurs.

That doesn’t mean reality is imaginary by any means because the idea isn't unhinged solipsism either. It simply means your access to reality is mediated. And the moment you accept mediation, you have to accept a second point that most people resist: Different states of consciousness can change what information becomes accessible, and how.

This is not mystical. It’s a practical statement about signal processing. A brain is not a camera. It is a prediction interface, a coherence engine, and a pattern-stabilizer. So the question becomes: what happens when consciousness becomes more coherent, more quiet, more stable, and more capable of holding subtle signal without smearing it into noise?

You don’t get “magic.”

You get access.

3) The body is not “you.” The body is your local interface.

Here is the cleanest way I can say it without drifting into fantasy: Your body is not the source of consciousness; nor is the brain for that matter. Your body is the local interface through which consciousness experiences a constrained world.

Now, let me be clear without drifting into too much idealism and metaphysical jargon: the body matters. It’s not disposable. It’s not “lower.” It’s not an enemy, and this isn't meant to encourage "wisdom" quotes like "life is suffering."

Simply put, it’s an instrument.

It’s a receiver tuned to the bandwidth of human life: time, emotion, pain, love, limitation, decision, consequence and practically the whole nine yards of consciousness and processing. Yet, it's really about the signal moving through that receiver; the awareness itself, is not as local as the receiver is.

Most people intuitively sense this in moments of intensity: grief, awe, deep meditation, near-sleep states, high stress, and deep love. Something about those states makes awareness feel bigger than the personality.

To be clear, I am not asking you to “believe” anything here.

I’m saying: treat nonlocality as a working hypothesis.

If consciousness is nonlocal, even partially, then several things suddenly become plausible in a way they were not before:

• Telepathy as information coupling rather than “hearing voices”

• Remote viewing as nonlocal perception rather than fantasy

• Precognitive impressions as time-access artifacts rather than superstition

• Synchronicities as information alignment rather than mere coincidence

• UAP contact as a mind-matter interface rather than an nuts-and-bolts “spaceship flyover”

That’s the bridge.

4) The “Aligned” is not a religion. It’s a placeholder title for an observed layer of reality.

Call it whatever you want. The word itself is irrelevant, whether you use "God", "Universal Consciousness", or even "The flying spaghetti monster." When I use a word like “Aligned,” I’m not trying to sell theology nor convert anyone to New Ageism or some religion replacement. It's not even about spirituality either. I’m using language to the best of my abilities to describe a layer that becomes obvious once you accept nonlocal mind as real: a responsive background intelligence or organizing field that behaves like coherence itself, bringing together probabilities from quantum states.

• Not a bearded deity.

• Not a human-like judge.

• Not an idol.

• Not an ET cosmology.

More like what you’d call an ocean current or wind current. You can’t see the current directly. You see what the current does as it manifest events in your life. You see patterns of movement, clustering, timing, and emergence. You see how things, people, and events “find each other” in ways that are too structured to dismiss as random, but too subtle to reduce to simple cause-and-effect.

In this model, the Aligned is the coherence-current. The organizing principle. The intelligence layer expressed through correlation, timing, resonance, and adaptation. It's the current of the universal consciousness that entangles quantum fluctuations, subatomic particles, atoms, chemicals, people, things, events and reality itself.

And yes, I believe non-human intelligences can operate through that layer with far more precision than humans typically do, because they’re not trapped in the same perceptual training we are. Not because they’re “better.” Because they’re differently situated relative to the field. Not to mention, many of them probably do not have cultures that reinforce an inhumane loop to "feed the system", allowing the rich and greedy to profit at the expense of the common man.

5) Why UAP forms often mirror the human imagination

Now, we enter some serious complexities. This is where people get lost. They see symbolic similarity, and they assume it proves the whole thing is “made up" or they go so far with their imagination that they neglect physical reality, their loved ones, and friends. However, have you ever thought that symbolic similarity can also mean the opposite?

It can mean the interface uses the observer’s symbolic library as a translation layer.

If a non-human intelligence is interacting through a consciousness-mediated channel, then “shape” may not only be engineering. It may also be language. It may be communication via a form that the corresponding consciousness can interpret and understand within its limitations and within what external knowledge has been internalized. It may be a controlled coupling between communication, expectation, archetype, and manifestation.

That would explain why the phenomenon often appears in ways that feel strangely tailored:

• A person watches a certain style of craft in media, then sees that style appear in reality later (happened to myself, multiple times with flying saucers, formations, boomerangs and pyramids, which even my wife saw with me; meaning it was not solely imaginary but real, tangible reality)

• A group holds a stable intention toward a specific type of anomaly, and the anomaly arrives with that signature

• Someone dreams of a specific geometry or “knows” a form is coming, then later observes it physically

• Encounters cluster around certain mental states, meditation states, or life transitions

In my own experience, this connection has shown up repeatedly. Not as “wish fulfillment,” but as a creative resonance that seems to prime the channel. A person watches something like a pyramid craft in fiction, later finds themselves thinking about that geometry, later sees a real-world anomaly that matches the signature.

A person (in this case, myself) studies boomerang forms for months, then I actually saw these "crafts" in person multiple times, sometimes with my wife. A person (again, using myself as an example) spends weeks engaged with the saucer archetype, and then one day, in broad daylight, the archetype stops being a story and becomes a physical sighting.

This is a consistent pattern in the ecology of the phenomenon: mind and manifestation are coupled.

The mistake is thinking this makes it “fake.” The deeper interpretation is that contact is not simply visual. It is interactive. And in many ways than just the old 1970s science fiction "contactee" tropes. The contact or communication itself is complex, sophisticated, and multilayered in addition to being sometimes specifically tailored to the contacted person.

6) “ESP” is not supernatural. It’s underdeveloped human sensing.

Most people hear “telepathy” and immediately picture a cartoon or Star Trek tropes with mind reading. I prefer a cleaner framing: Telepathy is nonlocal information exchange.

That’s it.

It doesn’t have to be dramatic.

It doesn’t have to be audible.

It doesn’t have to be “voices.”

It can show up as:

• A sudden, crisp knowing

• A sentence that arrives with a different “texture” than your normal thought stream

• An image that appears in the mind with unusual clarity and emotional neutrality

• A predictive impression that later matches external events

• A shared impression across multiple people without coordination

The reason modern society struggles here is not because ESP is impossible. It’s because most people are noisy receivers thanks to being conditioned to believe they either can't do it, or only some figurehead can. They are saturated with distraction, emotional turbulence, and constant external input, especially from the ongoing modern chaos of social media, excessive work hours and non-stop going. Noise does not stop signal from existing. Noise stops you from noticing it.

Meditation, sobriety, and basic nervous-system regulation do not “make you spiritual.” They make you coherent. And coherence is the condition that reveals subtle signal. Now, I want to be clear that I am not here to tell people whether they should take psychedelics, drugs, or what not, but what I am saying is that having a moment to turn off, feel safe, and allow both spheres of the brain to sync helps a lot more than you may imagine. And yes, sometimes, this means putting down the weed or edibles to feel that.

7) The “soul” is not a ghost inside the body. It’s the nonlocal continuity behind the person.

The popular image of the soul is basically a floating copy of the body. That image is too literal and too human. Pythagoras had also posited the idea of the spirit in the brain, but that, too, is also quite limited.

A better model is this:

The soul is the continuity of awareness across states.

The “you” that you experience as a person is a local expression of something wider, filtered through biology. When the body dies, the local filter ends. The continuity does not become nothing. It changes state. This idea does not require blind faith to be useful.

It’s a structural hypothesis that integrates:

• The nonlocal qualities of mind

• The meaningfulness of synchronicity

• The persistence of identity-like signature across altered states

• The sense of “more” that shows up in deep experiences

And if that’s true, then NHI contact is not merely “aliens visiting.” It’s a relationship between layers of mind, layers of reality, and layers of nonlocal intelligence that do not depend on the body in the way human culture assumes. This is why the expectation of communication with NHI as a conversation in English or whatever language, is quite limited. The reality is that NHI, particularly those advanced enough to utilize the "Aligned" field, do not necessarily need to communicate solely through language.

Think interstellar here. Advanced NHI would be able to communicate also through time itself along with correlated events, not strictly through word-to-word exchanges we expect from other humans.

8) “Disclosure” is not an announcement. It’s an acceleration of contact literacy.

If you want a positive framing, here it is: Disclosure is the gradual increase of contact literacy across the population. Not everyone becomes an experiencer. Not everyone needs to. But more people begin to recognize that reality is not closed and that consciousness is not an accidental byproduct.

• That mind is not a prison inside the skull.

• That intelligence exists in forms we did not anticipate.

• The old fantasy is “they will prove themselves to the world.”

• The more realistic arc is: the world becomes capable of perceiving what is already here.

That difference matters.

Because in this model, the bottleneck is not simply secrecy.

The bottleneck is perception.

9) A practical way to evaluate claims without falling into cynicism or gullibility

Here’s what I actually trust, and what I don’t.

I trust patterns that are:

• Repeated over time

• Observed by more than one person independently

• Correlated with state changes (sleep, meditation, heightened coherence, altered states)

• Coupled with external anomalies (timing, geometry, responsiveness, unusual behavior)

• Able to be described clearly without inflation

I don’t trust:

• Narrative overload, especially with over-the-top spiritualistic dogma and New Ageism

• Claims that require you to accept a full cosmology on day one

• Idol-making, guru-making, savior-making, prophets, heralds and the like

• Anthropomorphic fantasies presented as certainty

• Stories that always magically flatter the teller while insulting everyone else

Notice what’s missing here.

I’m not telling you to “believe me.” I’m telling you to adopt a higher-resolution filter. The goal is not to debunk the world. The goal is to see the world as it is.

10) Why the phenomenon seems to “respond” to attention

Attention is not just looking. Attention is an allocation of consciousness. And consciousness, in this model, is not passive. It is participatory. That doesn’t mean you can stare at the sky and summon a craft on command like a party trick. It means attention can change the probability structure of what you experience, what you notice, and what interfaces back with you, sooner or later.

If the phenomenon operates partly through an information-based layer, then attention is not irrelevant. Attention is the handshake. This also explains why contact experiences often carry a feeling of dialogue. Not always a dialogue in words.

A dialogue in structure.

You focus. Something shifts. You notice. The anomaly appears. The timing feels too clean. The geometry or form/craft/UAP holds too long. The movement behaves too intentionally. The sequence continues.

People describe that, and skeptics say, “You’re pattern-seeking.”

But pattern-seeking is not a pathology. Pattern-seeking is how intelligence works, granted, it doesn't fall into pathology. The only real question is whether the pattern is internally generated or externally coupled.

And the honest answer is: both can happen.

That’s why discernment matters.

11) What I’m actually saying, in one sentence

UAP and NHI are not merely “out there.” They are part of a larger ecology of mind and reality where consciousness, information, and manifestation interact.

If you want a more technical phrasing:

The phenomenon behaves like an adaptive, nonlocal intelligence interfacing with human perception through a coherence-mediated channel, sometimes presenting as structured aerial forms, sometimes as informational contact, and often as synchronized sequences that collapse probability into experience.

That is a mouthful.

But it’s closer to the behavior than the old options we’re given.

12) Why this matters now, and why I’m optimistic about it

Here’s the part I actually feel excited about: If consciousness is primary or at least fundamental, then the future of this topic is not just better cameras. It’s better coherence. It doesn't only end at disclosure politics and constant rabbit holes of entertaining yet ultimately, unfulfilling information that doesn't actually benefit your life.

It’s not just arguing about whether something is a balloon, plane, or satellite. It’s learning what reality is, and what we are inside it. There is a quiet revolution happening in the background of modern life: people are starting to notice that their minds are not sealed boxes.

They are starting to notice that reality responds. Not in a childish “manifest a sports car” way. In a structural way: timing, convergence, pattern, meaning, and contact. And once you see it, you can’t unsee it. You don’t have to abandon physical reality to take this seriously. You have to expand your understanding to include the observer as part of the system.

That’s not anti-intellectual.

That’s the next step.

13) Closing

If you read this and feel a strange mix of familiarity and discomfort, that’s normal. The topic challenges one of our deepest assumptions: that consciousness is an accident sitting on top of dead matter.

My working model is the opposite: Matter is a stable expression inside a larger field of consciousness and information, and the UAP phenomenon is one of the clearest places where that deeper architecture leaks into view.

Not as a belief system. It's an interaction.

If you want to treat UAP seriously, don’t only ask “what are they?”

Ask the harder question:

What is reality, such that they can be this?

And what is consciousness, such that we can meet them at all?

That’s where the real conversation begins.

Support JRP, Gain Access to the Nexus

Join our inner research circle for early footage, extended analysis, and technical reports. Your support helps us sustain the ongoing research, cameras, and transmissions that become the Nexus. Inside, you’ll find deeper writings, footage, and behind-the-scenes disclosure.

Join us—and help anchor the Real.